Fort Valley State University--Department of Languages
ENGLISH 399: Literary Criticism
Critical Theory and Jurgen Habermaas
ENG 399
Critical Theory
The driving force of Critical Theory is "negative
thinking-built on the idea of the reflective attitude."
This suggests that the world is not the ordered and stable place
it appears, but underneath is full of chaos and contradiction.
Negative thinking's power is that it allows the contradictions
to be revealed. Critical Theory makes emancipation possible by
removing as much distorted communication as possible. To reach a
point where their communication works toward emancipation and not
as a societal tool of repression. Critical Interpretation is a
form of Praxis in that it doesn't accept the status quo; rather
it asks for something different.
Knowledge is always linked to interest.
Critical Theory Identifies Three types of theory:
- 1. Technical Interest...(labor) mastering or controlling
nature. See Marxism.
- 2. Practical Interest... how we understand each other.
- 3. Emancipatory Interest...the "critical
sciences"...the attempt to eliminate the distortion
and manipulation of our norms.
Society is seen as the product of human action structured
by norms and values.
Criticism begins by examining the norms and values.
Habermass wants to "prod society towards a universal
rationality in which everyone participates equally; and a
situation where communication is not distorted systematically or
unintentionally. "Universal Rationality."
The Legitimization Crisis of Western Civilization is a crisis
of rationality resting on the false belief that we can build an
orderly society (democracy) out of conflicting private interests
(capital).
The Language Game of Liechtenstein (Habermaas' model of
language/society)
- 1. Language works through rules we internalize
- 2. The rules regulate the combining and interpretation of
symbols.
- 3. Success presumes that actors follow norms
intentionally and that the norms appear as justified.
- 4. Justification arises from FORCE + the RULES.
- 5. During interaction, the inequities between power and
force = MANIPULATION (distortion) which leads to
agreements which aren't truly consensual (false
consensus).
- 6. This leads to reification (treating people as things)
and it leads to us thinking of society as a natural
object or thing rather than a construction of man.
- 7. We study things by breaking them into parts. Thus we
fragment society and develop a different
"science" for each piece.
- 8. This further obscures society as a process-rather we
see a set of objects in a fixed relation to one another.
- 9. Therefore, because those on the inside are
"naturalized" power can only be challenged from
the outside...Systems generate rules which prohibit
critique and promote false consensus.
Critique begins through Problematizing (calling into question
norms, rules).
- 1. Inquire into whether the norms are warranted
- 2. Most knowledge is conveyed via argument and the critic
must examine the rationality of the argument.
- A rational argument is high in participation and
low in distortion.
- Logic is not the only ground for accepting
arguments Empirical Coercion refers to arguments
that seem to provide the "best"
argument.
Ethnomethodology -the study of the people's
methods of creating social order.
- Asks: How do we get things done?
- How does society work?
- Examines how a society builds up shared understandings
which are "created anew and reaffirmed during the
course of each interaction."
- So, we conspire together to create the impression that
our unstable interactions are stable.
Ethnomethodology asks how the rules/systems allow us to
maintain the illusion of meaning as unproblematic.
- 1. discover the rules and be able to describe them so
clearly that a reader can see how/why something happens.
- 2. Problematize the rules (Garfinkeling)
Habermass' goal was Universal Pragmatics. The attempt
to uncover the rules governing language.
See J. Habermaas' Towards A Rational Society.
Questions? Email me at
Sophist@Bigfoot.Com.